Bid to recall Castle Rock mayor moves forward

Protest period is open until April 21

Posted 4/11/16

Town Clerk Sally Misare determined on April 11 that there are enough valid signatures for the recall effort to move forward in Castle Rock's District 1, which includes part of The Meadows.

The petitioners seeking the recall of Paul Donahue as …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

E-mail
Password
Log in

Don't have an ID?


Print subscribers

If you're a print subscriber, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one.

Non-subscribers

Click here to see your options for becoming a subscriber.

If you’re a print subscriber or made a voluntary contribution in Nov. 2016-2017, but do not yet have an online account, click here to create one at no additional charge. VIP Digital Access Includes access to all websites


Our print publications are advertiser supported. For those wishing to access our content online, we have implemented a small charge so we may continue to provide our valued readers and community with unique, high quality local content. Thank you for supporting your local newspaper.

Bid to recall Castle Rock mayor moves forward

Protest period is open until April 21

Posted

Town Clerk Sally Misare determined on April 11 that there are enough valid signatures for the recall effort to move forward in Castle Rock's District 1, which includes part of The Meadows.

The petitioners seeking the recall of Paul Donahue as District 1 councilmember and town mayor needed a minimum of 147 valid signatures; the Castle Rock town clerk has validated 242 signatures. The required number of signatures is defined in state statute and town charter as 25 percent of the number of votes cast within the district the last time a councilmember from that district was elected.

Donahue was first elected in 2008, and re-elected in 2012. His term will expire in November, and he is term-limited.

The petition to recall Donahue — submitted by residents Suzanne Hackett, Malia Reeves and John Buckley — claims Donahue's leadership style and voting record have been detrimental to the health of the community.

“I would like to emphasize that the recall is not a form of punishment, but it's a demonstration of active citizenry,” Hackett said.

Specific incidents cited in the petition allege Donahue has dramatically reduced allotted time for public comment; denied residents the opportunity to speak; and shown deference to out-of-town developers and "citizens who support his personal and political interests."

“Mr. Buckley, Ms. Reeves, and I represent a diverse and substantial group of residents who seek a different type of leadership in our community — we are simply the messengers,” Hackett said.

The next step in the recall process is a protest period in which a registered Castle Rock voter could dispute the petition. The protest period ends at the close of business on April 21. After April 21 and absent a successful protest of the petition, Town Council will address the timing of the special election.

“I am absolutely intrigued and excited to see how this election process plays out,” Donahue said, adding that a local petition process a few years ago resulted in Castle Rock voters being left ”high and dry.”

“It was kind of crazy,” he added.

Town officials said they will continue to update the community throughout the petition and election process.

The recall election will cost about $10,000, according to Castle Rock Town Clerk Sally Misare and statements at the April 5 Town Council meeting.

Donahue will continue to serve in office while this process takes place.

Comments

1 comment on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
LJordan

It appears these self-serving individuals have managed to move this forward- very unfortunate. If they truly only desired a "...different type of leadership..." they could have selected to wait and practice adult like patience since his term is up in Nov. So it is a lie and intellectually dishonest for these people to claim that they are not acting punitively. I find it interesting that every time one of them is interviewed they always are quick to throw out a comment denying that it is not personal even when they aren't asked. I have been at council meetings and witnessed their childish behavior so it is definitely a childish act garnished in lies. Too bad they can't be sued for libel and slander because they would definitely be found guilty of both acts. They should be responsible for paying the town back when this fails!

Thursday, April 14, 2016 | Report this